Fetterman dismisses AOC's impeachment call over Trump's Iran attack

Well, folks, it looks like the political fireworks are exploding louder than the actual airstrikes President Trump ordered on Iran's nuclear sites.

In a heated clash within the Democratic Party, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania has outright rejected Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s demand to impeach Trump over his decision to target Iran’s nuclear facilities at Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan on Saturday.

Fetterman, never one to shy away from a blunt opinion, scoffed at the idea on Fox News’ “America’s Newsroom,” saying, “Of course, no, she knows it.” He’s got a point—impeachment isn’t a toy to toss around every time someone disagrees with a policy, no matter how bold or controversial the move. Let’s face it, diluting the term just turns it into political white noise.

Fetterman challenges impeachment rhetoric

“That’s not going anywhere,” Fetterman added, reminding everyone that Trump’s already weathered two impeachment storms and still holds the Oval Office. If history’s any guide, this latest call from the progressive wing might just fizzle out faster than a wet firecracker.

Ocasio-Cortez, on the other hand, came out swinging, labeling Trump’s strikes a “grave violation” of constitutional norms. She’s not wrong to question the lack of congressional input, but jumping straight to impeachment feels like using a sledgehammer to crack a walnut.

She doubled down, claiming Trump “impulsively risked launching a war” that could drag on for generations. That’s a hefty accusation, but without broader party support, it’s more of a loud solo than a chorus.

Trump’s strikes spark controversy

Let’s rewind to Saturday, when Trump announced the strikes on Iran’s key nuclear hubs, boasting of inflicting “monumental damage.” Top military brass are still tallying the wreckage, but the president’s confidence suggests he believes this was a decisive blow. Whether that holds up under scrutiny remains to be seen.

Fetterman, a staunch pro-Israel voice in his party, didn’t just defend the strikes—he practically cheered them on. “I’ve always been calling for that,” he told Fox News, framing the action as a necessary check on Iran’s nuclear ambitions. It’s refreshing to see someone in D.C. stand firm on national security without waffling to appease the far-left crowd.

He went further, downplaying the strikes as a “very limited military exercise” rather than the war Ocasio-Cortez fears. Turns out, not every missile launch is Armageddon, and Fetterman’s cool-headed take cuts through the hysteria like a knife through butter.

Democratic divide deepens over Iran

Not all Democrats are on board with Fetterman’s view, though—Rep. Sean Casten of Illinois echoed Ocasio-Cortez, calling the strikes an “unambiguous impeachable offense.” That’s a strong statement, but without Democratic leadership backing impeachment, it’s more bark than bite.

Speaking of leadership, top party figures have criticized Trump for bypassing Congress before ordering the attack, though they’ve stopped short of endorsing removal from office. A top Democratic source told The Post, “I think impeachment is not a wide sentiment.” Seems like cooler heads might prevail, at least for now.

Fetterman, who’s clashed with his party’s progressive faction since the Hamas attack on Israel in October 2023, also took a swipe at past Democratic calls for a ceasefire. “Our party has often been wrong,” he said, pointing to Israel’s success in weakening Hamas and Hezbollah. It’s a polite but pointed reminder that sometimes strength, not appeasement, gets results.

Iran retaliates, US base targeted

Meanwhile, Iran didn’t sit idly by after the strikes—nearly a dozen missiles were fired at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, the largest U.S. military installation in the Middle East. Initial reports indicate all were intercepted, which is a testament to American defense capabilities.

Still, this retaliation serves as a stark reminder that even targeted actions can provoke sharp responses. Iran’s capabilities may be limited, as Fetterman noted, but they’re not out of the game yet.

Fetterman remains unfazed, asserting that Israel holds “air supremacy” over Iran and that the strikes were “entirely appropriate” to cripple their nuclear potential. His confidence in the operation—and in Israel’s strategic edge—offers a counterpoint to the hand-wringing over escalation. Perhaps it’s time for some in Washington to realize that playing defense alone won’t deter determined adversaries.