Comer: No proof Biden knew about autopen usage

Is someone playing fast and loose with the presidential signature, or is this just another Washington mystery? Rep. James Comer (R-KY), chairman of the House Oversight Committee, dropped a curious tidbit on a recent "Hannity" broadcast, revealing that his committee's probe has yet to tie Joe Biden to the use of an autopen for signing official documents. It's a head-scratcher that raises questions about who's really calling the shots.

For those just tuning in, Comer’s investigation is digging into whether Biden had any knowledge of an autopen—a device that replicates a signature—being used on presidential paperwork, but so far, there's no evidence linking him to the process.

Let's rewind to the start of this unfolding drama on Fox News Channel's "Hannity," where Comer laid out the basics. As the head of the House Oversight Committee, he's spearheading an inquiry into the use of this automated signing tool. So far, the trail to Biden himself is cold.

Investigation Hits a Memory Wall

Comer shared that a recent interview with someone close to Biden yielded nothing—no recollection, no insights, just a blank slate. It’s eerily similar to an earlier witness, Dr. O’Connor, who took the Fifth rather than spill any beans. Seems like amnesia is contagious in certain circles.

“Well, we interviewed another person that worked very closely with Joe Biden, and I will say this, Joe Biden apparently wasn’t the only person that had a poor memory in the Biden administration,” Comer quipped. If memory serves, no one, then who’s left to piece this puzzle together? It’s almost as if the White House is a ghost town for answers.

Even more peculiar, Comer noted that folks believed to be in Biden’s inner circle haven’t even seen the man in the White House, despite reports placing him there. It’s a bizarre disconnect that begs the question: Who’s minding the store? This isn’t just odd—it’s a red flag waving in the wind.

Who’s Really Running the Show?

Comer hinted at a tight-knit group—small enough to count on one hand—potentially making critical decisions behind closed doors. If true, that’s a troubling thought for anyone who values transparency in government. Accountability shouldn’t be a game of hide-and-seek.

“There is no evidence, thus far, that has emerged that Joe Biden knew anything about who was using the autopen or the process involved in authorizing the use of the autopen,” Comer stated. Well, that’s a relief—or is it? If the president isn’t in the loop, then who’s signing off on America’s future?

The investigation isn’t slowing down, though, with Comer promising more depositions on the horizon. Names like Ron Klain and other high-ranking figures might soon be called in for questioning. It’s a slow burn, but the heat could turn up fast.

Family Ties Under Scrutiny

Here’s where it gets stickier: Comer suggested that even Biden’s immediate family could be dragged into this probe. If that happens, the stakes climb higher, and the spotlight gets hotter. Family matters are personal, but public trust is paramount.

The goal, as Comer put it, is to uncover the truth for the American people, and that’s a mission worth supporting. After all, if executive orders or pardons bear a forged signature, those documents could face serious legal challenges. Actions, as they say, carry weighty consequences.

“We are going to bring them all in and get the truth to the American people,” Comer insisted. That’s a bold promise in a town where truth often plays hard to get. Let’s hope the committee’s persistence pays off without turning into a political circus.

Legal Risks Loom Large

Speaking of consequences, Comer raised a critical point: if Biden’s name was indeed forged on official paperwork, the validity of those actions could be contested in court. That’s not just a paperwork glitch; it’s a potential constitutional crisis waiting to unfold. We’re talking about the foundation of executive authority here.

For now, the investigation marches on, with more witnesses to come and more layers to peel back. The lack of evidence tying Biden to the autopen might comfort some, but it frustrates others who crave clarity on who’s wielding power. It’s a reminder that in politics, the absence of proof isn’t always proof of absence.

As this saga continues, one thing is clear: the American people deserve answers, not shadows. Comer’s commitment to transparency is commendable, even if the road ahead looks murky. Let’s keep our eyes peeled—sometimes, the smallest signature tells the biggest story.