CEO comes forward to admit he was being recruited for anti-Trump protests

Dating back to Trump’s first term, there has always been the belief that many of the protests we saw were paid for by liberal activists, such as George Soros.

The media has always downplayed this angle, but that may soon change.

An advocacy group CEO just came forward with some rather astonishing claims.

LA Protests

When the protests erupted over the LA immigration crackdown, Trump made it clear he thought many of these protests were staged events.

At the time, he stated, “These people are agitators, they’re paid, they’re professionals, they’re insurrectionists, they’re troublemakers. They’re all of those things. But I believe they’re paid.”

The media immediately pushed back, with the New York Times fact-check claiming that Trump’s claims were not supported by any evidence.

Now, the publication did not exactly get into any research it did on this, more or less basing its conclusion on existing reports.

Backing Palestine

As we all know, the Israel-Hamas war created a massive divide in the Democrat Party, and played a major role in helping Trump beat Harris in the election.

Ironically, for those protests, many were traced back to Democrat donors, including some of the people who helped fund Biden’s campaigns.

Politico actually did dig into this, and what it found was rather astonishing in terms of where the funding originated.

James Fitzpatrick, Director of the Center to Advance Security in America, stated, "Many liberal, left-leaning non-profits that are giving to organizations that are directly funding these protests on campus. And frankly, due to that, it’s no wonder the Biden Administration was silent for so long on the issue.”

Big Money

Adam Swart, the CEO and founder of Crowds on Demand, makes money by supplying protesters, but he claims he turned down a massive paycheck.

Swart stated, "Interests aligned with the organizers of the July 17th movement have approached us and, in fact, we rejected an offer that probably is worth around $20 million dollars," he claimed, referring to the “No Kings” protests.

On why he turned it down, he stated, "But personally, I just don’t think it’s effective. So it’s not, I’m not trying to call myself virtuous for rejecting it. What I’m saying is, I’m saying I’m rejecting it, not because I don’t want to take the business, but because, frankly, this is going to be ineffective. It’s going to make us all look bad."

That, my friends, is what I like to call a thread. Now we just need to pull on it and see where it takes us.