Democratic insider claims Schiff endorsed classified leaks against Trump

Explosive new documents have revealed a Democratic whistleblower accusing Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) of greenlighting leaks of classified information to tarnish President Donald Trump.

According to files recently obtained by Just The News and handed over to Congress by FBI Director Kash Patel, a longtime Democratic staffer from the House Intelligence Committee has blown the lid off what they call unethical and even "treasonous" behavior under Schiff’s watch.

Let’s rewind to 2017, when this whistleblower, with over a decade of service on the committee, first brought their concerns to the FBI. They didn’t just hear rumors—they claim to have sat in a meeting where Schiff explicitly authorized leaking sensitive data. And not just any data, but material meant to discredit Trump and, according to the whistleblower, potentially lead to his indictment.

Whistleblower’s shocking account of Schiff’s meeting

Picture this: a room full of insiders, Schiff at the helm, allegedly declaring that classified info would be weaponized against a sitting president. The whistleblower recalls unnamed attendees brushing off concerns, reassuring everyone they’d never get caught. Well, turns out secrets don’t stay buried forever.

This isn’t some fleeting accusation either. The whistleblower stuck to their story, most recently sitting down with the FBI in 2023 to reiterate these damning claims. If true, this paints a troubling picture of political gamesmanship at the highest levels.

Now, let’s talk about the documents themselves, freshly declassified and delivered to Congress by Patel. They lay bare the whistleblower’s account of Schiff’s alleged directive to leak derogatory information about Trump. It’s the kind of thing that makes you wonder just how deep the swamp really goes.

Documents reveal alleged abuse of power

John Solomon, co-author of the Just The News report, didn’t hold back on Fox News Channel’s "Hannity," saying, "This is the first of several major leak investigations." He’s hinting at more revelations, suggesting other big names might soon face similar scrutiny. If that’s the case, buckle up—Washington’s about to get messier.

Solomon also noted, "Their own staff turned them in." That’s right, even loyalists couldn’t stomach what they saw as betrayal of trust and duty. It’s a rare moment when party lines crumble under the weight of conscience.

He added a pointed question: "Does that dynamic change?" With past inaction on such leaks, Solomon’s asking if accountability might finally kick in under a different administration. It’s a fair question for a system that often seems allergic to consequences.

FBI’s role and Patel’s bold move

FBI Director Kash Patel didn’t just sit on this bombshell—he shared the report on X, stating, "Congress can see how classified info was leaked." He’s framing this as a chance to expose whether our institutions have been twisted to push political narratives. That’s a wake-up call for anyone who values transparency over partisanship.

Patel’s decision to declassify and deliver these documents isn’t just bureaucratic housekeeping. It’s a deliberate push to let lawmakers—and the public—grapple with the possibility that trust was breached at the highest levels. Actions like these remind us that sunlight is the best disinfectant.

Now, let’s circle back to the whistleblower’s courage. With over 10 years on the House Intelligence Committee, they weren’t some outsider tossing wild accusations—they were in the room where it allegedly happened. Risking their career to report this in 2017 and again in 2023 speaks to a conviction that something was deeply wrong.

Questions of accountability loom large

What does this mean for Schiff and others potentially implicated? If the whistleblower’s account holds up, it’s hard to see how this doesn’t spark serious investigations into the misuse of classified information. After all, playing fast and loose with national security for political gain isn’t just a bad look—it’s a betrayal of public trust.

For conservatives, this story fuels long-held concerns about a weaponized bureaucracy targeting Trump at every turn. Yet, even for those on the other side of the aisle, the idea of leaking sensitive data should raise alarms. This isn’t about left or right—it’s about right and wrong.

So, where do we go from here? Solomon’s warning of more leak investigations suggests this is just the tip of the iceberg, and Patel’s push for transparency keeps the pressure on. One thing’s for sure: in a town where accountability often feels like a mirage, this story reminds us that sometimes, actions do have consequences.