Trump humorously proposes Somalia reclaim Rep. Ilhan Omar over Kirk controversy

President Trump just dropped a diplomatic zinger that’s got everyone talking. In a recent Oval Office meeting, he jokingly suggested to Somalia’s leader that they might want to “take back” Rep. Ilhan Omar after her controversial remarks about the late Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA. It’s a quip that’s ignited both laughter and debate in conservative circles.

The saga began with tragedy on September 10, when Charlie Kirk, the 31-year-old conservative firebrand behind Turning Point USA, was killed at an outdoor event in Utah. Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old with leftist leanings, now faces charges of aggravated murder and other offenses in connection with the shocking crime. It’s a loss that has shaken many who admired Kirk’s unapologetic stance on traditional values.

Just a day later, Rep. Ilhan Omar stepped into the fray with comments that poured fuel on an already blazing fire. Speaking to the progressive outlet Zeteo, she dismissed public admiration for Kirk, accusing mourners of ignoring his “hateful rhetoric.” Her blunt words—“These people are full of s—”—didn’t exactly win hearts on the right.

Trump’s Witty Jab at Omar Sparks Reaction

Omar didn’t stop there, taking to X with a video slamming Democrats and celebrities for “normalizing” Kirk. She branded him a “reprehensible human being” and a “stochastic terrorist,” terms that cut deep for those who saw him as a defender of free speech. It’s the kind of language that makes you wonder if empathy took a vacation.

On CNN, Omar doubled down, refusing to pay tribute to Kirk’s legacy. “I’m not going to sit here and be judged for not wanting to honor any legacy this man has left behind,” she declared, pushing for his memory to be tossed into “the dustbin of history.” For many conservatives, it’s a stance that feels less like principle and more like a cheap shot at a man who can’t respond.

Enter President Trump, who couldn’t resist weighing in with a bit of humor during a meeting with Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud. “I suggested that maybe he’d like to take her back,” Trump quipped, only to add that the Somali leader shot back with, “I don’t want her.” It’s a lighthearted jab, but one that underscores a deeper frustration with Omar’s rhetoric among Trump’s base.

Omar’s Remarks Draw Conservative Backlash

The room, including Vice President JD Vance and FBI Director Kash Patel, reportedly chuckled at Trump’s remark. For many on the right, it’s a moment of levity in a story otherwise steeped in grief and division. After all, when actions stir up this much controversy, a little humor might be the only way to cope.

But not everyone found the situation funny, especially as Omar’s words continued to reverberate. She even likened Kirk to “Dr. Frankenstein,” suggesting he “was killed by his monster”—a metaphor that struck many as tasteless given the circumstances. It’s the kind of comment that makes you question where the line is between critique and cruelty.

The backlash wasn’t limited to Trump’s quip, as South Carolina Rep. Nancy Mace moved to censure Omar for what she called “celebrating murder.” Unfortunately for Mace, the effort stalled when four House Republicans sided with Democrats to block the measure. It’s a reminder that even in moments of moral clarity, politics can muddy the waters.

Public Figures Pile on Criticism of Omar

Professional golfer Phil Mickelson also joined the chorus of criticism, taking to X to express his dismay. “Ilhan spews hate every time she opens her mouth,” he posted, echoing sentiments of many conservatives who feel Omar’s rhetoric crosses a line. He even suggested she be “sent back” to Somalia, raising questions about her path to U.S. citizenship—a debate that’s sure to linger.

For conservatives, Omar’s comments represent more than just a personal attack on Kirk; they’re a symbol of a broader progressive agenda that often seems to scorn traditional values. Her refusal to offer even a nod of respect to a fallen figure strikes many as emblematic of a cultural divide that’s only widening. It’s not just about one person—it’s about what kind of discourse we want to normalize.

Kirk’s death was a gut punch to those who saw him as a champion of free thought and conservative principles. While opinions on his legacy vary, the manner of his passing demands a certain level of decorum, something many feel Omar has sidestepped entirely. Turns out, words have consequences, even in the heat of ideological battles.

Navigating Grief and Division in Kirk’s Wake

The tragedy in Utah has exposed raw nerves on both sides of the political spectrum. For every voice decrying Omar’s harshness, there are others who argue she’s merely speaking her truth. Yet, in a time of mourning, a little restraint might go a long way toward healing rather than inflaming.

Trump’s humorous aside to Somalia’s president may not solve anything, but it does highlight a frustration shared by many who feel Omar’s words were ill-timed at best. It’s a classic Trump move—using wit to cut through tension while making a point about accountability. Whether it lands as comedy or controversy depends on where you stand.

As this story unfolds, one thing is clear: the clash over Charlie Kirk’s legacy and Ilhan Omar’s response isn’t just about two individuals. It’s a microcosm of a nation grappling with how to disagree without descending into disdain. Maybe, just maybe, we can find a way to debate with dignity—though don’t hold your breath waiting for that day to come.