FBI chief Kash Patel rebuts Tucker Carlson on Trump assassin claims
Hold onto your hats, folks—FBI Director Kash Patel just dropped a bombshell response to Tucker Carlson’s eyebrow-raising claims about the man who tried to take down President Trump.
On a tragic day at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, Thomas Crooks attempted to assassinate Trump, leaving the president wounded, two attendees gravely injured, and a local fire chief, Corey Comperatore, dead, while the nation watched in horror.
The incident unfolded on July 13, 2024, at the Butler Farm Show Fairgrounds, where Crooks fired from a rooftop less than 200 yards from the stage before being neutralized by a Secret Service counter-sniper.
Patel Unveils Massive FBI Investigation Details
Fast forward to Friday, when FBI Director Kash Patel stepped into the spotlight to counter allegations from Tucker Carlson, the former Fox News host known for stirring the pot.
Carlson has been pushing a narrative that Crooks left a trail of violent online threats and might not have acted solo, even claiming access to the shooter’s Google Drive and old YouTube comments from 2019-2020.
He’s suggested the FBI is hiding something big about Crooks’ motives, painting a picture of a cover-up that smells fishier than a progressive policy seminar.
Carlson’s Claims of Digital Threats Debunked
Carlson didn’t hold back, alleging, “Thomas Crooks came within a quarter inch of destroying this country, and yet, a year and a half later, we still know almost nothing about him or why he did it.” (Tucker Carlson)
That’s a hefty charge, but let’s unpack it—sounds like a classic case of sensationalism over substance when the FBI has been anything but quiet on their findings.
Patel fired back with hard numbers, stating the investigation involved over 480 agents, more than 1,000 interviews, and analysis of nearly half a million digital files across 25 online accounts.
FBI Stands Firm on Lone Wolf Conclusion
Patel was crystal clear, saying, “The investigation, conducted by over 480 FBI employees, revealed Crooks had limited online and in person interactions, planned and conducted the attack alone, and did not leak or share his intent to engage in the attack with anyone.” (Kash Patel)
That’s a direct slap to Carlson’s theory of a shadowy accomplice, and it’s backed by a mountain of evidence that would make even the most skeptical conservative nod in approval.
Even the FBI’s rapid-response X account chimed in to correct the record, pointing out they never denied Crooks had an online presence, directly contradicting Carlson’s spin.
Questions Linger Despite Thorough Probe
Carlson’s take includes a curious detail about Crooks shifting from a Trump supporter to an opponent during the COVID-19 pandemic, which he called an “amazing transformation.”
While that’s an interesting tidbit, it hardly proves a conspiracy, and without a released motive from the FBI, it’s just another piece of the puzzle that fuels speculation rather than clarity.
At the end of the day, the FBI’s exhaustive work—over 2,000 public tips, hundreds of hours of video, and scrutiny of financial records—paints Crooks as a lone actor, not the tip of some hidden iceberg, leaving Carlson’s claims looking more like a ratings grab than a revelation.




