Hosts of 'The View' unload on Maine Democrat Graham Platner over sexting scandal and mounting controversies
The co-hosts of ABC's "The View" did something unusual last week: they turned their fire on a Democrat. Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner, the presumptive nominee challenging Republican Sen. Susan Collins, drew bipartisan scorn from the panel after reports surfaced alleging he had been sexting with as many as twelve women while married, and that his own wife had flagged the messages to his campaign staff.
"It is disturbing; it is horrible," co-host Ana Navarro said during the segment. "Why can't we do better? Why can't we have better candidates?"
It is a fair question, and one Democrats should have been asking long before the scandals started piling up. Platner, a Marine veteran and oyster farmer, married his wife Amy Gertner in 2023. Now, with a June 9 primary days away and a 7.8-point polling lead over Collins in the latest RealClearPolitics aggregate, the candidate at the center of his party's hopes for retaking the Senate is drowning in self-inflicted damage.
The sexting allegations and the campaign's own admissions
Reports emerged over the weekend alleging Platner had been exchanging sexually explicit messages with up to twelve women while married. His wife, Gertner, reportedly flagged the alleged texting to campaign aides, including former political director Genevieve McDonald. McDonald has since confirmed the messages' existence to the press, the New York Post reported.
The campaign's defense did not exactly inspire confidence. A current campaign official told the New York Times the number of women was "only up to six", and that Platner had stopped doing it. That formulation, not a denial, but a haggle over the headcount, speaks for itself.
The sexting is not the only problem. Platner has faced scrutiny over a tattoo that resembled a Totenkopf, or "death's head" symbol, used by the Nazi SS. He denied knowing the symbol's ties and has since inked over it. He also had a since-deleted Reddit account containing what were described as incendiary screeds on multiple controversial topics.
'The View' panel piles on
The breadth of the criticism from "The View" was notable. This is a panel that rarely finds common cause against a Democratic candidate, yet every co-host who weighed in expressed some form of alarm or disgust.
Whoopi Goldberg broadened her criticism beyond Platner, citing recent sex scandals involving high-profile men, including former Rep. Eric Swalwell, and delivering a blunt verdict:
"As I was looking at this, no shade, gentlemen, but it just feels like y'all are out of control. Every time we turn around, somebody's got somebody else up against a wall and a bed. What is happening?"
Goldberg added that she was tired of hearing about such "character flaws" and offered a four-word prescription: "Just keep it in your pants."
Sara Haines called Platner's conduct a "character flaw" and went further, saying flatly that "this man should be nowhere near Congress."
Sunny Hostin, who stressed the importance of Democrats winning Maine's Senate seat, labeled Platner with a string of accusations, calling him, in her framing, someone who had made "racist remarks," an "anti-semite," "a liar," and a "homophobe."
A Republican voice on the panel sounds a warning
Alyssa Farah, the panel's GOP-leaning voice, used the moment to draw a broader lesson about what happens when a party looks the other way on character. She directed her warning at Democrats who might be tempted to rally behind Platner simply because of the seat's strategic value:
"As a Republican who sadly watched the quality of candidates we've put in office or chosen to run diminish over the last decade, I will tell you that it's not worth it. It's not worth compromising your morals and values and integrity."
Farah also offered a striking aside about the scandal's relative weight among Platner's controversies: "To be honest, his sexting is the least of my concerns." She argued Democrats have other paths to winning the Senate besides Maine.
Navarro, meanwhile, tried to frame the problem as bipartisan, invoking Ken Paxton in Texas. "Why do we have to have Ken Paxton in Texas who has got baggage?" she asked. "It's not even baggage; it's steamer trunks of ethical questions around him."
Why Maine matters, and why Democrats are stuck
The political stakes sharpen the dilemma. Sen. Susan Collins has held Maine's Senate seat for decades and is widely viewed as the most vulnerable Republican incumbent up for reelection. Democrats see the Pine Tree State as paramount to their hopes of retaking control of the upper chamber. Platner's 7.8-point polling edge over Collins in the RealClearPolitics aggregate made him, until recently, the party's best-positioned challenger in the country.
Now that advantage looks like a trap. With the primary slated for June 9, Democrats face a candidate whose own campaign cannot deny the sexting, only quibble about the number of women. Whose former political director has confirmed the messages to reporters. Whose tattoo controversy forced a cover-up, literally. And whose deleted Reddit posts suggest a pattern of reckless judgment that goes well beyond personal indiscretion.
The question is whether Democratic voters in Maine will heed the warnings from an unlikely source, a daytime talk show that almost never breaks ranks against one of its own party's candidates, or whether they will hold their noses and nominate Platner anyway because the seat is too important to lose.
The real lesson
What makes the "View" segment so telling is not that the hosts were harsh. It is that they were surprised. The panel seemed genuinely baffled that a party with the resources and ambition to flip a Senate seat could not find a candidate without a Nazi-adjacent tattoo, a trail of explicit messages, and a Reddit history that had to be scrubbed.
But the surprise only reveals the assumption underneath it, that vetting failures and character deficits are supposed to be the other side's problem. Democrats have spent years lecturing the country about standards in public life. Platner is what happens when those lectures meet an actual primary calendar and a winnable seat.
Navarro asked the right question: "Why can't we do better?" The answer, for Democrats in Maine, is that they chose not to, and now they are learning the cost in real time.
When even "The View" won't cover for you, you've run out of friendly territory.




