Louisiana judge clears former NFL players for college football, defying NCAA and SEC
A Baton Rouge judge granted a temporary injunction allowing former professional athletes to suit up for LSU and other schools this season, and the SEC responded by filing a federal lawsuit against the university and head coach Lane Kiffin on the same day.
East Baton Rouge Parish Judge William Jorden ruled Thursday night in favor of a group of athletes who had challenged NCAA eligibility rules barring former pros from returning to college football. The ruling, issued after a nearly nine-hour hearing at the 19th District Court just miles from LSU's campus, clears the way for players like former Cleveland Browns training camp tight end Dae'Quan Wright and former New Orleans Saints player Zxavian Harris to be rostered for the upcoming season, by any school willing to take them.
The decision landed just before LSU's roster submission deadline to the SEC and two days ahead of the Tigers' season opener against Clemson. Both Wright and Harris, each 22 years old, spent this past summer in NFL training camps before their professional stints ended. They expect to make their LSU debut when the Tigers visit Ole Miss on September 19, AP News reported.
The case sits at the center of a growing legal fight over where the line falls between professional and college athletics, and whether the NCAA and its conferences still have the authority to draw it.
Sankey spent three hours on the stand while the SEC filed suit behind his back
SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey testified for more than three hours during the hearing. Plaintiff attorney Tony Clayton pressed Sankey repeatedly on a core inconsistency: the conference allows professional athletes who played overseas to return to college and compete beyond five seasons, yet enforced harsher restrictions against plaintiffs who turned pro under previous NCAA guidelines and now want to come back.
Three separate times, Clayton asked Sankey whether the SEC had filed a lawsuit that morning in Alabama. The timing was not a coincidence. Approximately three minutes after Sankey took the stand in Baton Rouge, the SEC filed a federal lawsuit in Alabama naming LSU and Kiffin as defendants. The suit accused the school and its coach of orchestrating the recruitment of multiple athletes who then turned around and sued the conference in Louisiana state court.
The SEC framed the move as a defense of competitive order. Sankey told the court:
"The line between professional sports and college sports needs to be maintained."
But Judge Jorden was not persuaded. He could not get past one particular aspect of the case: whether the SEC had colluded to enact new guidelines targeting former pro athletes returning to college in the days immediately after the 19th District Court had already issued an earlier order allowing LSU to roster those same players. That earlier order had permitted LSU to add Wright and others to its roster, and Kiffin maintained throughout the hearing that the school was simply obeying it.
The SEC's new rules, adopted after that initial court order, threatened significant punishments, including fines and coach suspensions, for any member school that placed former NFL or NBA athletes on its roster. In other words, the conference moved to penalize schools for doing exactly what a court had already told them they could do. Courts in other high-profile cases have similarly blocked enforcement actions that ran counter to existing legal orders.
Wright and Harris say they never would have gone pro if they knew the door back was shut
Both Wright and Harris testified during the hearing. Each told the court they would not have signed professional contracts had they known the NCAA would bar them from returning to college football. Their testimony underscored a basic fairness argument the plaintiffs have pressed throughout the litigation: the eligibility rules shifted beneath players who made career decisions based on the old framework.
Wright, a tight end who attended Browns training camp, and Harris, who spent time with the Saints, are far from alone. Approximately 450 athlete plaintiffs nationwide have filed lawsuits seeking additional eligibility. Around 300 of them have already won at least temporary permission to play, Newsmax reported. What started as a single case in Louisiana state court has spread across the country.
Tony Clayton, the attorney representing the athletes, put it plainly after the ruling came down:
"It's not about coach Kiffin. It's not about LSU. It's about treating these kids fairly. Today, justice was served."
Kiffin, for his part, framed the situation as a practical reality the conference would have to accept. He pointed out that the court orders meant these athletes would play somewhere, and any school that refused to roster them was simply handing talent to a rival.
"At the end of the day, because of these rulings, they're either going to play for you or they're going to play somewhere else around the country."
Louisiana's attorney general showed up and made her loyalties clear
Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill arrived at the courthouse and opened her media scrum with two words: "Go Tigers." The remark left little doubt about where the state's top law enforcement officer stood on the matter.
Murrill offered a more substantive critique of the NCAA's regulatory posture as well. She argued that the governing body's constantly shifting eligibility rules created consequences far beyond the individual athletes challenging them. The ripple effects, she said, hit the universities recruiting those athletes, the teammates competing alongside them, and the coaches and administrators trying to comply with a rulebook that keeps changing. Judges across the country have increasingly been willing to intervene when governing bodies overreach, and this case fits squarely in that pattern.
Breitbart reported that Judge Jorden also considered holding the NCAA in contempt after the SEC adopted its punitive rules targeting schools that rostered former pros, a move that appeared designed to undercut the court's own prior order.
450 plaintiffs and counting, the NCAA's eligibility wall is crumbling
The scale of the legal challenge facing the NCAA and SEC is hard to overstate. Hundreds of athletes have filed suit in courts across the country. The five-for-five eligibility framework, the set of rules governing how many seasons a college athlete can compete, is under sustained assault from players who argue the system punishes them for briefly testing the professional waters.
The SEC's decision to file a federal lawsuit in Alabama on the same day its own commissioner was testifying in a Louisiana courtroom reveals how seriously the conference views the threat. By moving the fight to federal court, the SEC is attempting to shift the legal terrain away from state judges who have been sympathetic to the athletes. The conference has also announced plans to appeal Jorden's ruling. The broader legal battle resembles other recent cases in which federal courts have been asked to settle disputes that state-level rulings could not contain.
Kiffin was hired as LSU's head coach on December 1, 2025. In less than a year, he has turned the Tigers' program into the tip of the spear in a legal fight that could reshape how every college football program in the country builds its roster. The SEC named him personally as a defendant, accusing him of masterminding a recruitment strategy designed to create lawsuits.
That accusation is a remarkable one: a conference suing its own member school's head coach in federal court, alleging he weaponized recruitment to engineer litigation. Whether the claim holds up will depend on what the Alabama federal court finds. But the optics are striking, a conference that cannot keep its own house in order, turning to the courts to discipline a coach who says he was following a judge's instructions.
The hearing also raised questions about the NCAA's broader credibility as a regulatory body. When a state attorney general shows up at a courthouse, says "Go Tigers," and argues that the governing body's own rule changes are the real source of chaos, the institution's authority is not just being challenged in court. It is being mocked in public. Major judicial decisions have increasingly reshaped long-standing regulatory frameworks when courts determine that governing bodies have overstepped.
Wright is expected to play in LSU's season opener against Clemson. The Tigers had until Friday to finalize their roster. For the athletes who fought this case, the season starts now, regardless of what the SEC's lawyers do next.
The NCAA built a system that punished young men for chasing a dream and then trying to come home. A Louisiana judge just told them the door stays open, and no conference bylaw written in a back room can slam it shut.




